Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This review is from August, but I cannot see a response…)
Jari On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05 > Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov > Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 > IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014 > IESG Telechat date: N/A > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC > [ready with comments] > > Major issues: None > Minor issues: > > In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mentioned for the first > time. Does this acronym need to be in the published RFC, e.g. would it be > useful for readers reading this document 10 years later? > > RTP and RTCP need references. > > In general, I found this document not to be very friendly to people who don't > follow RMCAT. > > Nits/editorial comments: None > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
