Hi Spencer and all, Now I have submitted a new version of the document.
I have addressed Alexey's review. Now RMCAT does not appear on the document short title and as far as I am can see the comments from IESG reviews are also addressed. BR Zahed A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Zaheduzzaman Sarker and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements Revision: 09 Title: Congestion Control Requirements for Interactive Real-Time Media Document date: 2014-12-12 Group: rmcat Pages: 12 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09.txt Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements/ Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09 Diff: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-09 > -----Original Message----- > From: Spencer Dawkins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: den 26 november 2014 01:44 > To: Alexey Melnikov; [email protected] > Cc: Jari Arkko; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Gen-art] LC review of draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05.txt > > On 11/25/2014 09:50 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Thanks for the review. (Were the comments adopted by the authors? This > > review is from August, but I cannot see a response...) > > So, just to update the RMCAT crew, this document was approved on today's > telechat, pending comment disposition. > > On the comments from Alexey's review - the term RMCAT doesn't appear in the > text, but still appears in the short title on each page, so his comment on > expanding/explaining RMCAT still applies. RTP and RTCP now do have > references, so that comment has been handled. > > In addition, there were IESG evaluation comments from several ADs. The > comments from Brian and Barry were intended for me and the other ADs, so no > action required, but the other comments at > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements/ballot/ > should be considered. You should bask for a moment in the compliment Ted > included in his ballot. > > Please let me know if/when you have a revised ID, and I'll send the approval > note to the secretariat. > > And thanks for all your work on this. > > Spencer, as responsible AD > > > Jari > > > > On 03 Aug 2014, at 21:37, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >> > >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > >> > >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > >> you may receive. > >> > >> Document: draft-ietf-rmcat-cc-requirements-05 > >> Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov > >> Review Date: 3-Aug-2014 > >> IETF LC End Date: 13-Aug-2014 > >> IESG Telechat date: N/A > >> > >> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational > >> RFC [ready with comments] > >> > >> Major issues: None > >> Minor issues: > >> > >> In Section 1: RMCAT is not explained/expanded, when mentioned for the first > time. Does this acronym need to be in the published RFC, e.g. would it be > useful > for readers reading this document 10 years later? > >> > >> RTP and RTCP need references. > >> > >> In general, I found this document not to be very friendly to people who > >> don't > follow RMCAT. > >> > >> Nits/editorial comments: None > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Gen-art mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
