I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
receive.

Document: draft-ietf-radext-radius-fragmentation-09
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2014-12-25
IETF LC End Date:  2014-12-25
IESG Telechat date: NA

Summary:
This draft is ready to be published as Experimental RFC but I have some 
comments.

Minor issues:
-Not sure about this, [page 1] says Updates: 2865, 6158, 6929 (if approved). 
Can an experimental RFC update non-experimental RFCs?
I read the note in Section 12.1. Just raising the question.

Nits/editorial comments:
-[Page 4], Intro, it would be good to remind the reader on why the 4096 octet 
limit was put in place initially and what has changed since.

-[Page 4], Section 1, "limitation mean that"--->"limitation means that"

-[Page 4], "this approach does entirely solve"---> should it be "does not" ?

-[Page 5], "the set up"--->"the setup"

-[Page 5], "to implement the draft"--->"to implement the RFC"

-[Page 6], "NOT be used to exchange more than 100K of data", not clear what 
100K is here? bytes? why?

-[Page 7], "more than 4K of data", as above, not clear what 4K is?

-[Page 9], "the RADIUS and COA"-->"CoA" instead of "COA"

-[Page 14],"other then Additional-Authorization."--->"other than ..."

-[Page 14],"Compliant RADIUS Chlient"-->"...client"

-[Page 14],"if tey had"--->"if they had"

-[Page 27], "into a even"--->"into an even"


-Other:
* Not sure if this RFC should reference to draft-ietf-radext-bigger-packets as 
another alternative to look for?
* Please spell at first use: EAP, NAS, PKI, SAML,ABFAB
*chunk/chunking, would it be better to use fragment/fragmenting/fragmentation 
instead ? or mention the two terms are used interchangeably.



Best Regards,
Meral
---
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson
Research
www.ericsson.com
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to