Thanks for your review, Suresh. I agree with your points. Authors, are you taking this into account?
Jari On 07 Jan 2015, at 08:10, Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> > > Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > posting a new version of the draft. > > Document: draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-10.txt > Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan > Review Date: 2015/01/06 > IESG Telechat date: 2015/01/08 > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard but > I have some minor issues that the authors may wish to address. > > Section 4.2.1.1: > This sentence is missing a verb (reach?) > > The exclusion of routers reachable via an ECMP that includes S-E > prevents the forwarding subsystem from attempting to <MISSING VERB> a > repair endpoint via the failed link S-E. > > Section 4.3: > > The Compute_Neighbor_SPFs() function seems to be missing a check for > verifying if the interface is not the failed interface. I think the > following check should be added. > > if (intf != fail_intf) > > Thanks > Suresh > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
