I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Feb-04-2015
IETF LC End Date: Unknown
IESG Telechat date: Feb-05-2015
This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.
Major: 0
Minor: 1
Nits: 1
Minor: 1
1/ In Section 3, it appears that the second paragraph ("This rule ...
updated rule:") is modifying rfc5036 to use the new text given
below the quoted paragraph.
However, I am not sure whether this is normative update or simply
a suggestion. In the second paragraph, the authors write that,
"Hence, it is reasonable to say ..." What does "reasonable" mean?
Does it mean that rfc5036 is updated authoritatively with the
suggested text or simply that rfc5036 text need not be updated but
the text in this draft should be considered.
Nits:
1/ I am not sure what portions of this draft update rfc6720...
Perhaps item (8) in Section 1, but am not sure.
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
