Many thanks for your review. Authors, any thoughts on the comments below? Jari
On 05 Feb 2015, at 03:40, Vijay K. Gurbani <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments > you may receive. > > Document: draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-15 > Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani > Review Date: Feb-04-2015 > IETF LC End Date: Unknown > IESG Telechat date: Feb-05-2015 > > This document is ready as a Proposed Standard. > > Major: 0 > Minor: 1 > Nits: 1 > > Minor: 1 > 1/ In Section 3, it appears that the second paragraph ("This rule ... > updated rule:") is modifying rfc5036 to use the new text given > below the quoted paragraph. > > However, I am not sure whether this is normative update or simply > a suggestion. In the second paragraph, the authors write that, > "Hence, it is reasonable to say ..." What does "reasonable" mean? > Does it mean that rfc5036 is updated authoritatively with the > suggested text or simply that rfc5036 text need not be updated but > the text in this draft should be considered. > > Nits: > 1/ I am not sure what portions of this draft update rfc6720... > Perhaps item (8) in Section 1, but am not sure. > > Thanks, > > - vijay > -- > Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent > 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) > Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email protected] > Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
