I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Document:                         draft-ietf-tram-turn-third-party-authz-08.txt



Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg



Review Date:                     5 February 2015



IETF LC End Date:             4 January 2015



IETF Telechat Date:         19 February 2015



Summary: The document is well written, and almost ready for publication. 
However, I do have some editorial comments, which I request to authors to 
address.

Major Issues: None

Minor Issues: None

Editorial nits: See below

-------------

General:

QGEN_1: The text says "OAuth". Should it say "OAuth 2.0"?

-------------

Section 1:

Q1_1: The text says "OAuth". Should it say "OAuth 2.0"?

Q1_2: Please add an OAuth reference on first occurrence.

Q1_3: I suggest to add a sentence, saying that the document also defines how to 
use OAuth with the TURN extension.

-------------

Section 3:

Q3_1: The text says:

"In the future STUNbis [I-D.ietf-tram-stunbis] will support hash
agility and accomplish this agility by conveying the HMAC algorithms
supported by the STUN server along with a STUN error message to the
client."

I suggest to remove "In the future STUNbis".


Q3_2: The text says:

              "The STUN token is returned in JSON"

Should the text say "JSON format", "JSON syntax", or something similar?


Q3_3: Please add a reference to JSON on first occurence.

Q3_4: Where are the parameter names of the JSON message defined? Are the 
parameter names identical to the ones listed in section 6.2? Figure 3 does show 
an example, but there should be normative text.

-------------

Section 4:

Q4_1:    The section gives an example using a TURN server. But, before that 
TURN has not been mentioned, and TURN usage is not described until section 9.

In addition, I don't think the example even belongs in this section, which is 
only about obtaining the access token. I suggest to move the example to section 
9.

-------------

Section 7:

Q7_1: I suggest to change the section name to "STUN Server Procedures", or 
something like that.

-------------

Section 8:

Q8_1: I suggest to change the section name to "STUN Client Procedures", or 
something like that.

-------------

Regards,

Christer
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to