Sue,
On Apr 10, 2015, at 5:45 PM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > Sue, is there any reason to not use a similar registration range as the 0x80 > range? I.e.: > 0x00-0xbf - FCFS > 0xc0-0xff - IETF review? > > Sue: I am fine with use but it was not spelled out in the draft. If this is > the range, we will need a 2 Week LC to confirm this range for both types for > both types. Revise the draft so IANA can confirm, and I'll start the 2 WG LC > in parallel with the other processes. Since neither of our proposals were covered in the draft originally, it makes sense to go for an updated WGLC/IETF LC anyway. Once IANA confirms that the updated text is clear, I'll issue -04 and you can start that. -- Jeff
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
