On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Brian E Carpenter < [email protected]> wrote:
> > It seems the author didn't see my Last Call review, so this review has not > changed. > > Nope, I hadn't. Apologies for that. > As the writeup says, this is an update to a long document that mainly > resolves a > notified erratum and some oversights in the previous version's IANA > material. > Therefore I did not review the whole document. As far as I can tell, the > changes > reflect the description in the writeup. (I assume that IANA will work with > the > author to get the registry updates exactly right.) > Yes, that's already happening behind the scenes. > Minor Issue: > ------------ > > IMHO the "Change History" section should be summarised in a "Changes since > RFC7001" > section (rather than being deleted). > Sure, that seems a reasonable suggestion. Nit: > ---- > > 6.7. SMTP Enhanced Stauts Codes > > s/Stauts/Status/ > Fixed for next version. Thanks! -MSK
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
