Hello Meral,

Thank you for this comment.

Indeed, sticking too hard to the specifications, I think I forgot to introduce 
the purpose first.

I therefore propose to add one sentence in the abstract:
 This document specifies a distributed algorithm for automatic prefix
    assignment.  Thus providing an alternative to manual or centralized
    prefix and address assignment techniques. […]

And add a new paragraph at the very beginning of the introduction:
   This document specifies a distributed algorithm for automatic prefix
   assignment.  The algorithm provides a generic alternative to
   centralized (human or software based) approaches for network prefixes
   and addresses assignment.  Although it does not require to be
   configured to operate properly, it supports custom configuration by
   means of variable priority assignments, and can therefore be used in
   fully autonomic as well as professionally managed networks.

   Given a set of delegated prefixes, Nodes may assign available
   prefixes to links they are directly connected to, […]


Do you think it helps ?

Do you think I should publish an update immediately or wait for other comments 
first ?


Thanks

- Pierre



> Le 11 juin 2015 à 18:36, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
> receive.
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-06
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2015-06-11
> IETF LC End Date:  2015-06-11
> IESG Telechat date: NA
>  
>  
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC.
>  
>  
>  
> Major issues:
>  
> Minor issues:
>  
> Nits/editorial comments:
> I found the draft a bit hard to follow as the incentive was not clear at 
> first.
> A few sentences in abstract or introduction on 'why' we need this algorithm 
> and what would the 'alternatives' be would be useful.
> Right now it only says 'what' the algorithm does.
>  
>  
> Best Regards,
> Meral
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com/>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to