Hello Meral,

I pushed a new version with the proposed changes.

Thanks,

- Pierre

> Le 12 juin 2015 à 19:41, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> a 
> écrit :
> 
> Hi,
>   That is perfect, thank you. I think since the LC was June 11 you can 
> publish a new version with any other comments you received from LC.
>  
> Best,
> Meral
>  
>  
> From: Pierre Pfister [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 7:09 AM
> To: Meral Shirazipour
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of 
> draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-06
>  
> Hello Meral,
>  
> Thank you for this comment.
>  
> Indeed, sticking too hard to the specifications, I think I forgot to 
> introduce the purpose first.
>  
> I therefore propose to add one sentence in the abstract:
>  This document specifies a distributed algorithm for automatic prefix
>     assignment.  Thus providing an alternative to manual or centralized
>     prefix and address assignment techniques. […]
>  
> And add a new paragraph at the very beginning of the introduction:
>    This document specifies a distributed algorithm for automatic prefix
>    assignment.  The algorithm provides a generic alternative to
>    centralized (human or software based) approaches for network prefixes
>    and addresses assignment.  Although it does not require to be
>    configured to operate properly, it supports custom configuration by
>    means of variable priority assignments, and can therefore be used in
>    fully autonomic as well as professionally managed networks.
>  
>    Given a set of delegated prefixes, Nodes may assign available
>    prefixes to links they are directly connected to, […]
>  
>  
> Do you think it helps ?
>  
> Do you think I should publish an update immediately or wait for other 
> comments first ?
>  
>  
> Thanks
>  
> - Pierre
>  
>  
>  
> Le 11 juin 2015 à 18:36, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>  
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, 
> please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may 
> receive.
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-homenet-prefix-assignment-06
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date: 2015-06-11
> IETF LC End Date:  2015-06-11
> IESG Telechat date: NA
>  
>  
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC.
>  
>  
>  
> Major issues:
>  
> Minor issues:
>  
> Nits/editorial comments:
> I found the draft a bit hard to follow as the incentive was not clear at 
> first.
> A few sentences in abstract or introduction on 'why' we need this algorithm 
> and what would the 'alternatives' be would be useful.
> Right now it only says 'what' the algorithm does.
>  
>  
> Best Regards,
> Meral
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson
> Research
> www.ericsson.com <http://www.ericsson.com/>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to