The document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed Standard.
Upon re-review, the addition of section 3.4 raises a question of clarity. As written, the text says that the hash function matters only to the original thumbprint provider. Should there be a little bit of text talking about the need for the hash function to be the same for thumbprints to be comparable, or, phrased alternatively, that thumbprints with different hashes must not be compared? If there were no need for consistent production of the thumbprint, there would be no need for a Proposed Standard for the document.
Yours, Joel The new section 3.4 On 6/19/15 12:06 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05 JSON Web Key (JWK) Thumbprint Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern Review Date: 19-June-2015 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: The internet draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Note to readers: This review is provided because the spreadsheet said so. The draft appears not to be in last call yet. Also, this reviewer did not attempt to second-guess the design choices made by the WG. The choices are well-explain, and I understand it to be the WGs job to make them.] Major issues: N/A Minor issues: N/A Nits/editorial comments: N/A _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
