Hi, Francis, Thanks so much for your review! Please find my comments in-line....
On 07/17/2015 08:38 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Abstract page 1: usually there is no very explicit reference to the > RFC the document obsoletes. IMHO this case could be a reasonable > exception. FWIW, in the past, I was asked to explicitly note in the abstract what RFC this document was obsoleting/updating. > - ToC page 3 and 18 page 25: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > (I use a US English spell checker, I am trying to switch to > a UK one but both raise errors for the other alternative... > I suggest to ask the RFC Editor to uniformize/uniformise the > English variant...) Yes... I think they do this by default. > > - 1 page 3 and many other places: e.g. -> e.g., > > - A.1 page 29 (and other places): I have a concern about OS names, > for instance I prefer Microsoft Windows to simply Windows. > BTW the current offical name of Mac OS (MacOS) X is (Apple) OS X. We'll double-check and update as needed. Thanks! Best regards, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
