On 14/09/15 21:10, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I promise not to appeal. The downref rules are quite creaky and annoying, > so I'd support them being overhauled anyway, as long as egregious downrefs > can still be prevented or appealed.
Yep. Anything can always be appealed of course, and ID nits does call it out, but we (all of us) miss these over and over again. FWIW, my own impression is that the current IESG are more ok with the "accepted by the community" criterion being asserted (e.g. by the responsible AD) as obviously being the case. And I think that's a good thing, so we can avoid more of the process-only IETF last calls. Cheers, S. PS: I've added 7251 to the downref registry and called out the potential blooper in my ballot writeup. [1] [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dice-profile/writeup/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
