Thank you Russ, thank you Ron. Jari
On 29 Sep 2015, at 17:38, Ronald Bonica <[email protected]> wrote: > Russ, > > Agree on both points. I have: > > - removed the word "unique" > - moved Section 6 to an appendix > > Thanks for the review. > > Ron > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Russ Housley [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:30 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: IETF Gen-ART <[email protected]>; IETF <[email protected]> >> Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04 >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen- >> ART, please see the FAQ at >> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >> >> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you >> may receive. >> >> Document: draft-ietf-mpls-self-ping-04 >> Reviewer: Russ Housley >> Review Date: 2014-09-25 >> IETF LC End Date: 2014-10-02 >> IESG Telechat date: unknown >> >> Summary: Ready. >> >> Major Concerns: None. >> >> Minor Concerns: None. >> >> Other Comments: >> >> At the end of Section 1, the document says: "Each protocol listens on its own >> UDP port and executes its own unique procedures." What does "unique" >> mean here? What changes if "unique" is dropped from this sentence? >> >> Would it be more obvious to the reader the purpose of Section 6 if it were >> turned into an appendix? > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
