Even better. Thanks. On 15 Oct 2015, at 11:26, Tore Anderson <[email protected]> wrote:
> * Jari Arkko > >>> When translating a packet between IPv4 and IPv6, an SIIT >>> implementation MUST individually translate each IP address it >>> encounters in the packet's IP headers (including any IP headers >>> contained within ICMP errors) according to Section 3.3, except for >>> any address for which Section 4 explicitly states that the EAM >>> algorithm MUST NOT be used. >> >> I think this makes sense, and I at least feel this is better text >> than the original. Thanks. > > Hello Jari, > > My co-author felt the above was a bit too "conjunction-overflowy", so > we ended up with the following: > > Unless otherwise specified in Section 4, an SIIT implementation MUST > individually translate each IP address it encounters in the packet's > IP headers (including any IP headers contained within ICMP errors) > according to Section 3.3. > > This is in draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-eam-02. I hope you see this too as an > improvement over the original? > > Tore
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
