Thanks, all. Many thanks Joel for your review, and on focusing on key issues.
Jari On 03 Nov 2015, at 06:17, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you. This addresses my concern. > Yours, > Joel > > On 11/2/15 11:14 PM, Dhruv Dhody wrote: >> Hi Julien, All, >> >> So now we have - (and thanks for bearing with me, as we get there...) >> >> IGP Area subobjects in the XRO are local to the current AS. In case >> of multi-AS path computation to exclude an IGP area in a different >> AS, IGP Area subobject should be part of Explicit Exclusion Route >> Subobject (EXRS) in the IRO to specify the AS in which the IGP area >> is to be excluded. Further policy may be applied to prune/ignore >> Area subobjects in XRO after "current AS" change during path >> computation. >> >> I have also attached the diff of the working copy to show the GenArt and >> IANA review changes so far. > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
