Hi Meral, Thank you for the review.
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > Nits/editorial comments: > > [Page 3] 2nd and 3rd paragraph: The word "service" is used to designate > both the proxy-service and the second backend "application-service" as > per [MS-SFU]. This may confuse the reader at first read. > Suggestion would be to use "proxy-service" and "application-service". > [Page 8] after point "2." would also benefit from clearer use of these > terms. >From the point of view of the Kerberos protocol, there is only one service here, so I think it is appropriate to use only a single term. > [Page 8], last paragraph, it was not clear to me if "service principal" > is the "application service"? "service principal name" is the identifier used to represent the application service within the Kerberos protocol, yes. I am not sure if I should recommend that the authors make any changes to reduce the potential for confusion. -Ben Kaduk _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
