Thanks for your review, Meral. FWIW, I often find myself struggling with “service” used in different contexts, but I’ll defer to Benjamin on how well any changes would fit in the Kerberos terminology and environment…
Jari On 03 Dec 2015, at 06:25, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ben, > Thank you for considering, I read it from the eyes of someone new to the > document, and perhaps ref [MS-SFU] caused the doubts. I agree that for people > following the work this is probably obvious:) Since it is a Standards > document I think it will clarify a lot if the same term is used across the > document; you are probably a better judge on that. > > Best, > Meral > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 6:57 PM >> To: Meral Shirazipour >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >> draft-ietf- >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-kitten-cammac-04 >> >> Hi Meral, >> >> Thank you for the review. >> >> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015, Meral Shirazipour wrote: >> >>> Nits/editorial comments: >>> >>> [Page 3] 2nd and 3rd paragraph: The word "service" is used to >>> designate both the proxy-service and the second backend >>> "application-service" as per [MS-SFU]. This may confuse the reader at first >> read. >>> Suggestion would be to use "proxy-service" and "application-service". >>> [Page 8] after point "2." would also benefit from clearer use of these >>> terms. >> >> From the point of view of the Kerberos protocol, there is only one service >> here, so I think it is appropriate to use only a single term. >> >>> [Page 8], last paragraph, it was not clear to me if "service principal" >>> is the "application service"? >> >> "service principal name" is the identifier used to represent the application >> service within the Kerberos protocol, yes. >> >> I am not sure if I should recommend that the authors make any changes to >> reduce the potential for confusion. >> >> -Ben Kaduk > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
