Thanks for the review, Meral!! Authors, have you see the suggested editorial changes? Wanted to make sure they are not missed.
Jari On 22 Feb 2016, at 20:19, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-mmusic-proto-iana-registration-05 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2016-02-22 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-02-26 > IESG Telechat date: NA > > Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I > have some comments. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > -[Page 2,3], please spell out RTP, SDP, AVPF at first use. > -[Page 2] "simulation data" is listed as real time along with audio, video. I > suggest removing it and putting "time critical application" if that is what > we want to convey. > -[Page 5], Section 5, "in the Section 3"---->"in Section 3" > > Best regards, > Meral > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson > Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
