Thanks, Joel. Authors, any responses to this? I think we need to discuss this…
Jari On 12 Feb 2016, at 00:26, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-martin-urn-globus-02 > A URN Namespace for Globus > Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern > Review Date: 11-Feb-2016 > IETF LC End Date: 9-March-2016 > IESG Telechat date: 17-March-2016 > > Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as an informational > RFC. > > This reviewer assumes that the appropriate message has been or will be sent > to [email protected]. > > Major issues: > As per the pointer in this document to RFC 3406 section 4.3, this document > is required to have a Namespace Considerations section which "outlines the > perceived need for a new namespace (i.e., where existing namespaces fall > short of the proposer's requirements)." While there is a section called > Namespace Considerations, what it lists is the envisioned usages, not the > reasons existing name spaces are insufficient. > > Minor issues: N/A > > Nits/editorial comments: N/A > > _______________________________________________ > urn mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
