[Correcting gem-art with gen-art in the email alias] Many thanks for your review, Francis.
All editorials fixed in my working copy. I left “encased” in since that term is used in RFC 5885 and others, but of course will take guidance from the RFC Editor. Thanks, — Carlos. > On Apr 5, 2016, at 3:26 PM, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20160331 > IETF LC End Date: 20160405 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - in ToC page 2 and 2.1 page 4: capabilites -> Capabilities > > - in ToC page 2 and 6 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 2.2.2 page 5 (twice): signalling -> signaling > > - in 2.3 page 6: I am not sure (*) the "encased" term is common English > (*) but I am not a native English speaker too... I suggest to ask > someone from Asia for instance. Or simply leave this to the RFC Editor? > > Regards > > [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
