I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-pals-seamless-vccv-02.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20160331 IETF LC End Date: 20160405 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None Nits/editorial comments: - in ToC page 2 and 2.1 page 4: capabilites -> Capabilities - in ToC page 2 and 6 page 9: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 2.2.2 page 5 (twice): signalling -> signaling - in 2.3 page 6: I am not sure (*) the "encased" term is common English (*) but I am not a native English speaker too... I suggest to ask someone from Asia for instance. Or simply leave this to the RFC Editor? Regards [email protected] PS: already sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
