Thanks for your review, Francis. Authors, did you see the suggested editorial nits?
Jari On 04 May 2016, at 09:51, Francis Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-06.txt > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review Date: 20160429 > IETF LC End Date: 20160429 > IESG Telechat date: 20160505 > > Summary: Ready > > Major issues: None > > Minor issues: None > > Nits/editorial comments: > - Abstract page 1, 4.1 page 7 and 4.2.2 page 9: i.e. -> i.e., > > - ToC page 2 and 2.2 page 5: variants -> Variants > > - ToC page 2 and 7 page 14: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments > > - 2.2 page 5: software[sacm-requirements] -> software [sacm-requirements] > > Regards > > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
