Thanks for the review, Brian. I tend to agree with this:
On 04 May 2016, at 20:48, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Deborah, > >> To help the reader, I'd say section 6's and section 7's headers should be >> more clearly labelled "An Abstraction Solution for Optical Domains and >> Networks" and for section 7 "Abstraction in the User-to-Network Interface". >> And these titles will align better with Section 8 "Abstraction in L3VPN...". >> >> Would that help? > > Yes. Basically it needs to be clear that the architecture can be 100% > implemented using current specifications, and that the possible extensions > are not required for this (and are therefore not really part of the core of > the BCP). Jari _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
