Thanks for your review, Russ. Again! Authors, any comments?
Jari On 31 May 2016, at 21:54, Russ Housley <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your > document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-04 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2016-05-31 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-06-22 > IESG Telechat date: unknown > > Summary: Almost Ready > > > Major Concerns: > > In Section 5.2, the document says: > > o The Ethernet type is used to identify the frame as inter-FE LFB > type. Ethertype 0xFEFE is to be used (XXX: Note to editor, likely > we wont get that value - update when available). > > There is a process for getting an ethertype assigned. It is handled by > the IESG. Please see: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/ethertypes.html > > > Minor Concerns: > > In Section 1.2: s/document reiterates the terminology defined/ > /document depends on the terminology defined/ > > In Section 2: s/The current ForCES model/The ForCES model/ > > > Nits: > > Many places: s/IPV4/IPv4/ > > In Section 2: s/architecture calls out for/architecture calls for/ > > In Section 3.1, why are the paragraphs in bullets? They see to work > just fine as normal paragraphs. > > In Section 5.2: s/header illustrated in Figure 6)/ > /header (illustrated in Figure 6) > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
