Thanks for the review! Authors, did you note the comments? Jari
On 26 Oct 2016, at 02:29, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-10 > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > Review Date: 2016-10-25 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-25 > IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03 > > Summary: > This draft is ready to be published as Experimental RFC, but I have some > comments. > > Major issues: > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > -General: the introduction should clarify the downside or extra complexity > with the proposed method (does the client need to be modified? what was the > reason the web did not opt for this method at first place? are there cases > where this method cannot be applied? > > -[Page 4], "are a one of"----->"are one of" > > -[Page 46], Section 18, not sure if it should be left in the RFC or removed? > Please check with chair or Responsible AD. > > > Best Regards, > Meral > --- > Meral Shirazipour > Ericsson Research > www.ericsson.com > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
