Thanks for the review! Authors, did you note the comments?

Jari

On 26 Oct 2016, at 02:29, Meral Shirazipour <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review 
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the 
> IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call 
> comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at 
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-10
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
> Review Date:             2016-10-25
> IETF LC End Date:     2016-10-25
> IESG Telechat date: 2016-11-03
> 
> Summary:
> This draft is ready to be published as Experimental RFC, but I have some 
> comments.
> 
> Major issues:
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> -General: the introduction should clarify the downside or extra complexity 
> with the proposed method (does the client need to be modified? what was the 
> reason the web did not opt for this method at first place? are there cases 
> where this method cannot be applied?
> 
> -[Page 4], "are a one of"----->"are one of"
> 
> -[Page 46], Section 18, not sure if it should be left in the RFC or removed? 
> Please check with chair or Responsible AD.
> 
> 
> Best Regards,
> Meral
> ---
> Meral Shirazipour
> Ericsson Research
> www.ericsson.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to