Matt, Many thanks for this.
Authors, did you have any responses on Matt’s comments? Also, Matt, I had one question for you: > > * The IANA registries this document establishes are not defined. > One can deduce the required information and its format, but there > is no guidance on review process (for example). I urge the authors > to consult RFC 5226 when revisiting the IANA considerations. What did you have in mind here? At least the -26 specifies Specification Required for the registries, and given RFC 5226’s guidance on what that means, I’m not sure what information is missing. Unless, of course, you think that there should further expert review guidance. Or is the problem that the allocation policy is in the table, not in the text, e.g.: > 13.6. DLEP Extensions Registrations > > > Upon approval of this document, IANA is requested to create a new > DLEP registry, named "Extension Type Values". > > The following table provides initial registry values and the > [RFC5226] defined policies that should apply to the registry: > > +--------------+----------------------------+ > | Code | Description/Policy | > +--------------+----------------------------+ > | 0 | Reserved | > | 1 | Credit Windowing [CREDIT] | > | 2-65519 | Specification Required | > | 65520-65534 | Private Use | > | 65535 | Reserved | > +--------------+----------------------------+ > > Table 3: DLEP Extension types > > Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
