Robert, Thanks for the review, again!
And thank you so much (for the whole set of people) for the new review tool and integration to the tracker. It makes my life much easier. Just a couple of discussion points relating to how we post these today wrt. before when we didn’t have the new tool yet. First, there’s been a change from “Gen-ART review: ….” to “Review of …” in the e-mail subject lines. Which do people prefer? I’ve obviously worked from the only-email-model so far, and ultimately me (or the next chair) will find the new ways of working. Which might be different from we’ve used to do. However, a knee jerk reaction from my side was that I’d like to see Gen-ART as a part of the subject line, because I often end up searching in e-mail. But maybe I shouldn’t... Second, I’ve noticed that there’s been a couple of reviews that were in the tracker only, and were not posted via e-mail. Again, wondering if I’m just feeling anxiety over the change :-) or if there’s a real reason why we’d like to have also email. After being confused for one or two documents, I now know to to look at the tracker as well as e-mail. Maybe I should just work from the tracker in this case? But I wonder if I’ll end up searching on e-mail _as well_ anyway, because somebody may have responded on e-mail side, and this might not be reflected in the tracker. Or is it? For the second issue, it might be possible to have the tool automatically mail reviews… and I think it does, except unless asked to do so (?) But I’m obviously just one user among many. I have my own viewpoint, and arguably e.g., the role of the authors and other WG participants is an important one, more important than mine, because it is absolutely essential that they see whatever is commented. So I don’t want to drive any process from my limited viewpoint, but rather bring up an issue that surprises me and then discuss what’s the best way to handle that. And since the review tool is new, this would be a good moment for us to hash out any minor usage practices. Thoughts? Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
