Jari Arkko <[email protected]> writes:
> First, there’s been a change from “Gen-ART review: ….” to
> “Review of …” in the e-mail subject lines. Which do people
> prefer?
It may depend on who you are. I only see reviews via the gen-art
mailing list or followups thereto, so the subject line always has
"[Gen-art]" in it. But other people get the messages by other paths,
and so they may not see distinctive subject lines.
Also, is there a reason why people would want to see "Gen-ART last-call
review of ..." vs. "Gen-ART telechat review of ..."? It wouldn't make a
difference to me, but perhaps it is useful input to someone else's
workflow.
I have noted that the current review template includes this information
block:
Document:
Reviewer:
Review Date:
IETF LC End Date:
IESG Telechat date: [if known]
The last two dates take some work to find -- would it be possible to
include them in the "review request" screen (e.g.,
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc/reviewrequest/8100/)?
Dale
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
