Thanks Joel, -11 only contains the fixes to the comments received by Jan. 17. I am now applying all the edits needed for the comments received after that. The next version will fix the problem you have pointed out.
Best, Nat On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:03 AM Joel Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Not Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-?? > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review Date: 2017-02-02 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-13 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16 > > Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed > Standard > > Major issues: N/A > > Minor issues: > Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described > as > "non-normative"? Is it incomplete? incorrect? An example is, by > definition, not a full specification. The language seems designed to > reduce the value of the example. I would recommend removing all the > "non-normative" notes from the examples. They are clearly stated to > be examples. > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > -- Nat Sakimura Chairman of the Board, OpenID Foundation
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
