Many thanks for your review, Joel.

I have balloted no-objection for this document on today’s IESG telechat.

Jari

On 03 Feb 2017, at 01:03, Joel Halpern <j...@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Not Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-??
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review Date: 2017-02-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-02-13
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard
> 
> Major issues: N/A
> 
> Minor issues:
>    Why is the example if section 4 (and others later on) described
> as
> "non-normative"?  Is it incomplete?  incorrect?  An example is, by
> definition, not a full specification.  The language seems designed to
> reduce the value of the example.  I would recommend removing all the
> "non-normative" notes from the examples.  They are clearly stated to
> be examples.
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to