s/The Best Current Practice documented in this note is/The optional Best 
Current Practice documented in this note is/

Regards
   Brian

On 06/05/2017 02:58, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Gunter,
> 
> Thanks much. A brief chat with Joel may clear this up.
> 
>                                Ron
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
>> [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 2:47 AM
>> To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-
>> [email protected]; [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
>>
>> Hi Ron, Gen-art directorate,
>>
>> I’m checking with John on the most optimal way forward. While I am not that
>> keen on the BCP status of the document, it was part of a motivation to split
>> up the original draft on the subject discussing community wifi networks from
>> the address related aspects. John and I will have a discussion on the subject
>> and propose a path to resolution of the issue mentioned by gen-art.
>>
>> G/
>>
>> On 04/05/2017, 21:57, "Ron Bonica" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>     Folks,
>>
>>     The following is status for draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host:
>>
>>     - WG last call complete
>>     - OPSDIR, GENART and INTDIR reviews complete
>>     - write-up complete
>>
>>     The following issue was raised in the GENART Review:
>>
>>     " The proposed status seems questionable.  We as a community are not
>> recommending that operators assign unique prefixes to hosts.  This
>> document is saying "if you want to do that, here is a way, using existing 
>> tools,
>> to make that work."  The document also recommends specific setting of
>> other flags (the O flag in the RA, for example) that are not closely coupled 
>> to
>> the particular topic.  This looks like an ordinary Informational RFC.  I 
>> would
>> have no concern with this being published with that label."
>>
>>     Could the authors please address this issues. As soon as they have done
>> so, we can send it to the IESG for publication.
>>
>>                                                                              
>>              Ron
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to