Meral, thanks for your review. Brian, thanks for addressing the points raised. I have ballotted no-objection but am following the discussion from others’ DISCUSSes.
Alissa > On Apr 20, 2017, at 2:43 PM, Meral Shirazipour > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > Thank you. > > Best, > Meral > > From: Brian Raymor [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] > Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 11:15 AM > To: Meral Shirazipour <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>; > [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-core-coap-tcp-tls-07 > > > Thanks for your feedback. > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > -Please spell out acronyms at first use. > > I will correct the BERT case and also review > https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt > <https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt> for other > potential cases. > > Tracked in https://github.com/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/132 > <https://github.com/core-wg/coap-tcp-tls/issues/132> > > > -Not sure if other documents address this, but does this document assume > > fixed CoAP devices > > as end point (not > moving and connectivity is assumed 'the same' during > > the TCP session?) > > It assumes fixed CoAP devices. > > …Brian > > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art>
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
