Thanks for the review. > Am 30.06.2017 um 17:43 schrieb Robert Sparks <[email protected]>: > > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03 > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review Date: 2017-06-30 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-13 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-03 > > Summary: Ready with nits > > I think this document wins the humorous autocorrect-generated (I hope) typo of > the week. See the last sentence of the second paragraph of the IANA > considerations. I suspect you want a different final word. > > I also expect IANA will send the decision for which of the options for placing > the registry you suggest back to the group. You would save time by just making > the decision now. Ask IANA now if you want their opinion on how the choice > should go. > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
