Hi Dan, On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dan Romascanu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08 > Reviewer: Dan Romascanu > Review Date: 2017-09-19 > IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-20 > IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-28 > > Summary: > > This document is Ready. I have reviewed the previous version (07) and the > resulting discussions with the authors and the edits for the current > version > (08) addressed most of the issues raised in the previous review. One single > issue remains open, it is minor, and concerns more the charter scope. > However, > as it is related to the Experimental status of the document, I am > mentioning it > again. I do not believe it was clarified in the revision or the > discussions. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > 1. As the document is targeting 'Experimental' it would be useful to > mention > what is the scope of the experiment. The charter actually says: > > ' The scope of the experiment will be > documented in the output of the Working Group.' > > Would not the Architecture document be the right place for this? If not, is > there another document that deals or is planned to define the scope of the > experiment? > Thanks for the review! The charter has an item (#9, I believe) for describing the results to progress to standards track. Regards, Alia
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
