The intent is for the WG to author a results draft with or without justification for moving the work to Standards track.
Greg On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Alia, > > Yes, I am aware about this. Yet, there is this little sentence in the WG > charter which does not seem to be answered by now :-) > > 'The scope of the experiment will be documented in the output of the > Working Group.' > > Regards, > > Dan > > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Alia Atlas <akat...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Dan, >> >> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Dan Romascanu <droma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >>> Review result: Ready >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >>> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just >>> like any other last call comments. >>> >>> For more information, please see the FAQ at >>> >>> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-bier-architecture-08 >>> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu >>> Review Date: 2017-09-19 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2017-09-20 >>> IESG Telechat date: 2017-09-28 >>> >>> Summary: >>> >>> This document is Ready. I have reviewed the previous version (07) and the >>> resulting discussions with the authors and the edits for the current >>> version >>> (08) addressed most of the issues raised in the previous review. One >>> single >>> issue remains open, it is minor, and concerns more the charter scope. >>> However, >>> as it is related to the Experimental status of the document, I am >>> mentioning it >>> again. I do not believe it was clarified in the revision or the >>> discussions. >>> >>> Major issues: >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> 1. As the document is targeting 'Experimental' it would be useful to >>> mention >>> what is the scope of the experiment. The charter actually says: >>> >>> ' The scope of the experiment will be >>> documented in the output of the Working Group.' >>> >>> Would not the Architecture document be the right place for this? If not, >>> is >>> there another document that deals or is planned to define the scope of >>> the >>> experiment? >>> >> >> Thanks for the review! The charter has an item (#9, I believe) for >> describing >> the results to progress to standards track. >> >> Regards, >> Alia >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
