Hi, >We discussed your first comment and we agree with Toerless's response. We >believe that the intro does express the intent and purpose of this BCP >adequately. Based on your second comment, we have changed the title of >Section 4 to "Functional Guidelines". The new version has been uploaded.
Ok. Thanks! Regards, Christer >-----Original Message----- >From: Toerless Eckert [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 2:59 PM >To: Christer Holmberg <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected]; >[email protected] >Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of >draft-ietf-mboned-interdomain-peering-bcp-10 > >On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 12:16:18PM +0000, Christer Holmberg wrote: >> >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on >> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.o >> rg_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=DwIBAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=4Z >> 9x1ZAReZp_mJahI6h9bQ&m=Yk2i9Ji8MOfUjKFN0Jp-3wS1nKYQtvqPqcyy5j0Rc2o&s=D >> GgoHGkoQq2XyywjloPLLrHgVKLzBLrEJ8qSkNxKa3I&e= >> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.o >> rg_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=4Z >> 9x1ZAReZp_mJahI6h9bQ&m=iIo_51LYIireg4AnsuBoZIWVunRNL9x6ZXHqz5Q2CGc&s=p >> eDTnfOaiDiT8_m4J-VWJr70Nt0m41lLVGq3yYls12k&e=>> >> >> Minor Issues: >> >> Q1: The Introduction talks about the growing usage of multicast, and >>the it begins the list what the document does. But, what is the >>background and need for the document? Is there a problem? Are there >>interoperability issues? At the end of the section it is said that ways >>to improve are identified, but it is unclear exactly what needs to be >>improved. I think it would be good to say a few words in the >>Introduction about the issues and problems. > >I am a bit at a loss. This is a BCP, eg: it is meant to document current >best practices. >It is not meant to suggest "improvements" for protocols or the like. The >abstract and intro do IMHO pretty well stsate the intent and purpose of >the doc. > >Maybe its just surprising to you that there has so far been no document >to describe how to deploy IP multicast interdomain, especially with the >inclusion of of options such as GRE and AMT - and simplifying it by only >using SSM ?? > >Or else: Do you have any text to propose ? > >> Editorial Issues: >> >> >> >> Q2: The title of section 4 is ?Supporting Functionality?. That seems a >>little strange in my eyes. Supporting functionality of what? >> >All the subsections are called "<function-foobar> Guidlines", so how >about wee call the whole section "Functional Guidelines" ? > >Cheers > Toerless > >--- >[email protected] _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
