Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a Yes ballot.

Alissa

> On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Stewart Bryant <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
> document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review Date: 2017-10-24
> IETF LC End Date: 2017-10-25
> IESG Telechat date: 2017-10-26
> 
> Summary: A well written document that is ready for publication
> 
> Major issues: None
> 
> Minor issues: None
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> 
> These are really minor but I notices them during the review.
> 
> Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Section 2.2 (simplicity have a lot of overlapping
> content. Perhaps they could be merged.
> 
> "This choice matches if all leafs present in the rule match the request." 
> Maybe
> it is different  in C/S but the plural of leaf is usually leaves.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to