Meral -

Thanx for the review.
Some of your comments have already been addressed in the latest version (07) 
published a few days ago.

Responses inline.

From: Meral Shirazipour []
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 8:02 PM
Subject: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before 
posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at 

Document: draft-ietf-bier-isis-extensions-06
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2018-02-12
IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-22 ?
IESG Telechat date: 2018-02-22

Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have 
some comments.

Major issues:
Minor issues:
Nits/editorial comments:
-please updated references to latest draft version/RFC number

[Les:] Done in V 07

-Section 2 would be clearer is the definitions introduced only in this document 
are identified as such

[Les:]  I don't think there are any introduced by this document. All of the 
definitions mentioned in Section 2 come from RFC 8279.

-Please spell out  multi topology, sub-domain at  first use for MT SD
[Les:] In Section 4.1 where we introduce the use of <MT,SD> here is what the 
text says (emphasis added):

"Within such a domain, the extensions defined in this document
   advertise BIER information for one or more BIER sub-domains.  Each
   sub-domain is uniquely identified by a subdomain-id.  Each subdomain
   is associated with a single ISIS topology [RFC5120], which may be any
   of the topologies supported by ISIS.  Local configuration controls
   which <MT,SD> pairs are supported by a router."

Do you think further clarification as to the meaning of <MT,SD> is still 

-[Page 6], "advertisments."--->"advertisements"

[Les:] Corrected in V 07.

-[Page 8], "occurences"--->"occurrences"

[Les:] The section which contains this misspelling was removed in V 07.


Best Regards,
Meral Shirazipour
Ericsson Research<>
Gen-art mailing list

Reply via email to