Hi Roni

Many thanks for the review.  You are right, in this case we meant "IETF 
Review".  I will update the document.

Cheers
Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even....@gmail.com] 
Sent: 26 February 2018 14:55
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: p...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type....@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08

Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Almost Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team 
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF 
Chair.  Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2018-02-26
IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06
IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05

Summary:
The document is almost ready for publication as standard track RFC Major issues:

Minor issues:
1. in section 7.2 "The allocation policy for this new registry  should be by 
IETF Consensus" why not use one of RFC8126 well known policies?

Nits/editorial comments:


_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Reply via email to