Roni, thanks for your reviews. Jonathan, thanks for your response. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Mar 2, 2018, at 12:15 PM, Jonathan Hardwick > <jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com> wrote: > > Hi Roni > > Many thanks for the review. You are right, in this case we meant "IETF > Review". I will update the document. > > Cheers > Jon > > -----Original Message----- > From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even....@gmail.com] > Sent: 26 February 2018 14:55 > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: p...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type....@ietf.org > Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-08 > > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call > comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-pce-lsp-setup-type-?? > Reviewer: Roni Even > Review Date: 2018-02-26 > IETF LC End Date: 2018-03-06 > IESG Telechat date: 2018-04-05 > > Summary: > The document is almost ready for publication as standard track RFC Major > issues: > > Minor issues: > 1. in section 7.2 "The allocation policy for this new registry should be by > IETF Consensus" why not use one of RFC8126 well known policies? > > Nits/editorial comments: > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
