Meral, thanks for your review. I see Barry incorporated your point about encrypted email into his ballot. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Apr 7, 2019, at 8:30 PM, Meral Shirazipour > <meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Thanks that would be great. > > Best, > Meral > > -----Original Message----- > From: Barry Leiba <barryle...@computer.org> > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 12:30 PM > To: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazip...@ericsson.com> > Cc: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview....@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat Call review of > draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-03 > > Thanks, Meral, for the review. > >> Minor issues: >> -It may be obvious to most but it would be good to also mention how >> encrypted email should be handle and what type of preview should be >> allowed if any > > It's certainly easy to say something, and I'll leave it to the author to > decide whether to. But, yes, it's obvious: if the mail is encrypted, the > server *can't* provide any meaningful preview. > > One reason it might be useful to say something is that the end of Section 3.2 > makes a semantic distinction between a zero-length string and NIL, so it > might be useful to say which one is applicable to an encrypted message. > > Barry > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > Gen-art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
