Hi, Thanks for clarifying. Best, Meral
On 6/5/19, 11:42 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi Meral, Thanks for your review. > Nits/editorial comments: > > It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for extensions. Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context of PCEP does not have any impact on the OAM. This association is in the context of LSP path computation and does not impact the data plane. Regarding the impact on path protection, it is best to discuss that in the context of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection, where the association-type for path protection is defined. That document is under shepherd review and it would be wise to add some text there. I have added the draft authors in cc to consider this. Regards, Dhruv _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
