Meral, thanks for your review. Dhruv, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa > On Jun 6, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Meral Shirazipour > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > Thanks for clarifying. > > Best, > Meral > > On 6/5/19, 11:42 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Meral, > > Thanks for your review. > >> Nits/editorial comments: >> >> It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on >> existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for >> extensions. > > Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context > of PCEP does not have any impact on the OAM. This association is in > the context of LSP path computation and does not impact the data > plane. > > Regarding the impact on path protection, it is best to discuss that in > the context of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection, where the > association-type for path protection is defined. That document is > under shepherd review and it would be wise to add some text there. I > have added the draft authors in cc to consider this. > > Regards, > Dhruv > > > _______________________________________________ > Gen-art mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
