Tom,
inline please
<snip>
<tp>
Once it waa G-ACH but not any more, it is G-ACh
RFC5586 still uses G-ACH
According to RFC 5586:
ACH is Associated Channel Header
G-ACh is Generic Associated Channel
RFC 5586 does not use G-ACH, RFC 5586 consistently uses G-ACh.
I don't know id we ever used G-ACH, it would be Generic Associated
Channel Header, which could be a proper name, but would be a slight over
specification.
I'd ask Matthew and Stewart to check if I got this right :).
/Loa
RFC7214 reorganised the IANA registres and gets the name right and may be the
best reference.
I am not sure where G-ACh first appeared but it was much dicussed in and around
MPLS-TP, Loa might know or else Adrian.
Tom Petch
Sent via a website that trashes what used to be e-mails rendering work a
stressful challenge
Thanks.
Nits:
Section 1: s/of active and hybrid, as defined in [RFC7799], OAM methods./
/of active and hybrid OAM methods, as defined in [RFC7799]./
GIM>> Thank you, done.
Thanks.
Section 2.1: Some terms have a hyphen between the term and the definition.
Others do not. Please use some separator in all cases.
Figure 3: s/DetNet Associated Channel Header/d-ACH/
GIM>> Done
Thanks.
Section 4.1: I cannot parse this sentence:
The manipulation makes the
identification of the TSN Stream in the intermittent TSN nodes avoids
the need to look for the S-Label afterward.
Please reword.
GIMM>> Thank you for raising up this. Please consider the following update:
OLD TEXT:
The first component identifies the DetNet flow (using Clause 6.8 of
[IEEE.802.1CBdb]) and the second component creates” the TSN Stream
via manipulation of the Ethernet header. The manipulation makes the
identification of the TSN Stream in the intermittent TSN nodes avoids
the need to look for the S-Label afterward.
NEW TEXT:
The first component identifies the DetNet flow (using Clause 6.8 of
[IEEE.802.1CBdb]), and the second component creates the TSN Stream by
manipulating the Ethernet header. That manipulation simplifies the
identification of the TSN Stream in the intermediate TSN nodes by
avoiding the need for them to look outside of the Ethernet header.
That works for me.
Russ
_______________________________________________
detnet mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
--
Loa Andersson email: [email protected]
Senior MPLS Expert [email protected]
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
