Hi Thomas, 

Many thanks for the review.

These are excellent suggestions. Except very few one, went with almost all your 
suggestions as you can see at: 
https://github.com/ietf-wg-cats/draft-ietf-cats-framework/pull/153.

Cheers,
Med (as author)

PS: rendered diff can be seen here: 
https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://ietf-wg-cats.github.io/draft-ietf-cats-framework/draft-ietf-cats-framework.txt&url_2=https://ietf-wg-cats.github.io/draft-ietf-cats-framework/boucadair-patch-2/draft-ietf-cats-framework.txt

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Thomas Fossati via Datatracker <[email protected]>
> Envoyé : lundi 23 février 2026 14:23
> À : [email protected]
> Cc : [email protected]; [email protected]; last-
> [email protected]
> Objet : draft-ietf-cats-framework-19 ietf last call Genart review
> 
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-cats-framework
> Title: A Framework for Computing-Aware Traffic Steering (CATS)
> Reviewer: Thomas Fossati
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
> Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
> processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these
> comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> <https://fra01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> Fwiki.ietf.org%2Fen%2Fgroup%2Fgen%2FGenArtFAQ&data=05%7C02%7Cmoham
> ed.boucadair%40orange.com%7Cd81e3ba71ed34d9ef26e08de72deb1ba%7C90c
> 7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C639074497970414915%7CUnkno
> wn%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiO
> iJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1iU
> O8Y2mYnRLzLi24zgRatdYUxDWthtee2XWSOcQIWU%3D&reserved=0>.
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-cats-framework-??
> Reviewer: Thomas Fossati
> Review Date: 2026-02-23
> IETF LC End Date: 2026-03-03
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
> 
> Summary: This document is ready for publication as an
> Informational RFC.
> 
> It clearly describes the CATS functional components, their
> interaction and high-level workflows.
> 
> The terminology section is extensive and clear.
> 
> The security and privacy considerations are also well written and
> to the point.
> 
> The diagrams are very nice and really help the reader grasp and
> connect the concepts. (I have a few suggestions on how to improve
> them further, but I could not easily find the repository that
> hosts the document, so I could not provide the suggestions in the
> form of a PR.)
> 
> Major issues: none
> 
> Minor issues: none
> 
> Nits/editorial comments: a few, see below.
> 
> §1
> 
> slight reflow:
> 
> OLD
> The CATS framework is an overlay framework for the selection of
> the suitable service contact instances from a set of candidates.
> 
> NEW
> The CATS framework is an overlay framework that selects suitable
> service contact instances from a set of candidates.
> 
> typo:
> 
> OLD
> [...] combination of networking and computing metrics determine
> 
> NEW
> [...] combination of networking and computing metrics determines
> 
> §2
> 
> s/decision making/decision-making/
> s/as distinct from/as opposed to/
> 
> §3.1
> 
> s/other than they are reachable/other than that they are
> reachable/
> 
> §3.2
> 
> slight reflow:
> 
> OLD
> This document does not make any assumption about the structure and
> semantic of this identifier. An example of such ID is a unicast IP
> address that uniquely identifies the location of a service
> instance.
> 
> NEW
> This document makes no assumptions about the structure or
> semantics of this identifier. One example of such an ID is a
> unicast IP address, which uniquely identifies the location of a
> service instance.
> 
> s/deployment specific/deployment-specific/
> 
> §3.4.1
> 
> s/that run in same/that run in the same/
> 
> §3.4.6
> 
> s/computing related/computing-related/
> 
> §4.3
> 
> s/in order to not constrain/so as not to constrain/ s/will be
> removed and/will be removed, and/
> 
> §4.4
> s/the flow or packets identification type/the flow or packet
> identification type/
> 
> §5.1
> 
> s/Such correlation/Such a correlation/
> or
> s/Such a correlation/This correlation/
> 
> §5.2
> 
> s/Retrieve active classification table/Retrieve the active
> classification table/
> 
> §5.4
> 
> s/this document suggests to implement the normalization
> function/this document suggests implementing the normalization
> function/
> 
> §6
> 
> s/may be modified by an attacker resulting in disrupted service
> delivery/may be modified by an attacker, resulting in disrupted
> service delivery
> 
> §7
> 
> s/at the application/protocol level depending/at the
> application/protocol level, depending/
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to