On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Sarah Stierch <sarah.stie...@gmail.com>wrote:
> In response to Sydney's post.. > > Having worked in the photography industry (and been forced in front of a > camera a few times in my day..) as a consultant and a make-up artist (10 > years in that industry) I've written, signed, had others sign, and dealt > with model release forms a million times over. Here is a nice standard break > down of that from the NYIP: > > http://www.nyip.com/ezine/techtips/model-release.html > > If we require permission for use via OTRS, I don't know why we can't have > "model release" be incorporated sexual/nude photography, modeling > photography, studio photography. Materials used for educational purposes, as > Commons is supposed to be, this shouldn't be too hard. I haven't thought too > hard about it yet, but, it is possible. > > I've been advocating for this for several years (check the archives of Foundation-l), but there's never been very much support - and none at all on Commons. Even the Board resolution only requires an "affirmation" from the uploader that the subject gave consent. Nathan
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
