1. If it's so clear that the "before and after" picture is of not one but two women, what is the intention behind it being restored? I know the answers could very well be guessestimates at best at this point, but how can we figure this out? 2. If the picture is showing results of a non-medical procedure, it should be stated as such. I remember accessing Wikipedia several times throughout my teenaged years; we cannot expect all of our readers to be an adult with a better understanding of anatomy.
From, Emily On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen <[email protected] > wrote: > On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Sarah <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > > What really bothers me is the "before" image shows a woman within a > > normal range, yet we are presenting this as something in need of > > surgery. I'm concerned that young women could stumble on this and > > start to doubt themselves. > > Somewhat related: The most well-known Danish woman's self-awareness > book, [[da:Kvinde, kend din krop]] was originally published in 1975, > and has been revised several times since. This year, the group behind > the book opened a photo booth in order to collect images of the > diversity of female genitalia. Have a look at it at > http://kvindekenddinkrop.dk/ - use your favourite translation service > if you don't read Danish (no, there are no genitalia on the front page > - the link 'BILLEDERNE' will take you there). > > Regards, > Ole > > -- > http://palnatoke.org * @palnatoke * +4522934588 > > _______________________________________________ > Gendergap mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap >
_______________________________________________ Gendergap mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
