On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Risker <risker...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On the Commons side of things, I think there has been an over-aggressive
> campaign to extract "license compliant" images from Flickr and other
> non-WMF repositories that include subjects who were very unlikely to know
> that their image was going to be made available on Commons. I believe that
> whoever uploads those images to Commons has a personal responsibility to
> verify that all of the subjects in those images was aware of, and agrees
> to, the licensing terms.  I also believe that it should become part of the
> process  that prior to uploading such images, the person uploading to
> Commons confirms with the Flickr uploader that the terms of the license are
> correct, and that there are suitable model releases where applicable.
>
> Let's not worry so much about what courts have decided, and pay more
> attention to developing best practices within our own projects.
>
> Risker/Anne
>


Agreed. Most of these are from Flickr, for example:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:ListFiles/Handcuffed

Going by past experience, the Flickr account holders are quite likely
unaware of these uploads.
_______________________________________________
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap

Reply via email to